Finding the Aesthetic of Sophia as a Response to Terrorism and Counter Terrorism in the World

 

Thomas Bowman

Copyright Tom Prescott 2006

 

 

 

Playing ping-pong with Jonah, age 17, and Eliza, 11, is always new. Last nightÕs discovery came about as I watched the ball closely even as the racquet I was holding was making contact with the ball. And everything changed. Not only is there an increase in concentration which allows more available time to address the ball with the necessary spin, counter spin and velocity but something more critical also occurs: the vagueness of my eyes that accompanies playing automatically is inhibited by a wondrous attention that frees a receiving of the periphery, opening from whence the organization of my response begins. ÒInhibitingÓ isnÕt really the right word, for it implies effort and intention. It is more like following the activity of an opening door that only occurs as the door closes. ÒI am the door. The opening and closing.Ó ChristÕs statement of the third miracle in the Gospel of John. This refers to ChristÕs perception of the mirror opposite likeness occurring simultaneously and spontaneously. As is, ÒI am- the door.Ó The simultaneousness of two opposite likenesses becomes a third consciousness that is the field of Sophia, a necessary realm for the miraculous to occur which coincides with its opposite likeness in the activity of sacrifice.

 

A good place to begin this understanding is with Rudolf SteinerÕs statement about the two kinds of thinking. Dead thinking is the thinking old thoughts that have been thought from the past. Living thinking is the thinking of new thoughts, perhaps from the future. I donÕt know where the preferential value comes from. On the face of it, the connotation of Òdead thinkingÓ would most likely be viewed as inferior to Òliving thinkingÓ, and Òliving thinkingÓ considered superior to Òdead thinkingÓ. This interpretation would be jumping to conclusions. For sacrificing this understanding is going to be crucial for perceiving Sophia, the anima mundi, interiorly.

 

This morning on awakening I heard these words, ÒNothing in nature is symmetrical.Ó  The hearing of which moved me near to tears. One of the qualities of words at dawn, for me, is they almost never makes any sense. Then they illuminate everything. It seems to require backing in from the furthest periphery. If we examine this phrase, Ònothing in nature is symmetricalÓ, some light can be born on this matter of the twofold thinking of philosophical Idealism.                                                                                                                       

 

 ItÕs always a spontaneous leap, finding the third way, seeing the word ÒnothingÓ from the point of view of the three. If we look at the literal content of dead thinking the word nothing connotes the absence of something, revealing the meaning of the phrase to state the nonexistence of symmetry in nature. If we interpret the word ÒsymmetryÓ from this nonexistent point of view the statement appears to be saying that there are no mirrored patterns in nature. Since this statement could easily be proven untrue by simply examining a single leaf, then one could conclude it was a false statement. This is a fine example of both the content of dead thinking and its implementation.

 

If we were to view the same statement from the vantage point of living thinking, the emphasis would shift from the content to its activity. The word ÒnothingÓ, no thing, is freed to be unnamable, inconceivable, and unknowable, all qualities of the Divine. This is to say, ÒThe spirit of God always manifests through the patterns of nature.Ó

 

What is most interesting is that both the dead and the living thinking are from the same source and equally valued by it. It is preposterous and destructive to the descending moral fabric of Sophia to attempt to be rid of one in favor of the other for each are required for a fertile field to be in existence. For when the content of nothing and the activity of nothing and symmetry as pattern and symmetry as activity/ inactivity are all simultaneously and spontaneously co creating a three fold thinking occurs. ÒWhen nature becomes truly alive the spirit of God is stirring in her.Ó The symmetry of the two becoming one is what creates the asymmetrical third, simultaneously and spontaneously.

 

What is the indication that a field exists?  Two images were presented. Firstly, a really imperfect statement, Ònothing in nature is symmetrical.Ó This seemingly dead statement required generous attention. And secondly, the living activity of the near tear is a beginning of the feeling state of the interior world, one of devotion. When the dead thinking and living thinking form a field, the two are becoming one (two plus one = three) and a third mode of thinking arises. I think this is what Robert Sardello and Cheryl Sanders mean when they speak of heart thinking. The heart not only being the bodily receiver for the imaginal, but also, the imaginal being in the heart field as both one and the same, inseparably .The sacrifice of the two in opposition generates the inception of the heartÕs consciousness.

 

This threefold thinking is vital for experiencing Sophia as an external deity, the soul of the world, and as an internal deity, a personal soulÕs drop of water being a part of the sea and the simultaneousness of the two together are the entering and generation of the interior of this field of Sophia. This simultaneousness is a state of consciousness that is neither just humanly inspired nor solely divinely inspired yet both presences are necessary for this imaginal field to be created.

 

 

ÒWhen the two become one Éthen you shall enter the Kingdom.Ó (#22, Gospel of Thomas) is not the dead thinking of synergy which refers to the content of the physical and its effects, for in synergy the two are literally one, i.e.: alcohol and sleeping pills when mixed become a new potentiated  compound where the original alcohol and sleeping medication are no longer also apparent. So, there is no three, only two fragments become a new one because there was no energetic field to begin with, only a dissolved merging.  This is the necessity of the living activity of anger which is never reactive but crucial for the integrity of vital boundaries to hold a field open. There is no threshold without two equal, polar door sills. I think it was Pablo Neruda who said, ÒLove is about equality, the more equal, the greater the love.Ó A poetic reference to this living field and the hidden sacrifice that occurs between the two lines yielding a third.

 

Sophia as the invisible field of the soul of the world requires this threefold thinking of the heart for like to become like. Mary is this living likeness through her embodiment of Sophia becoming visible. The moment this occurs a divine spark is ignited, illuminating a divine mystery. Within the field of Sophia the two become one and a third is generating. On entering the interior of this field a hidden and most precious unloved wound is experienced. Our greatest imperfection of all our dead thinking, once sacrificed becomes cherished as the unmanifested third within the field of Sophia and Mary manifesting as the black Madonna. She most often occurs within nature as one of her primary characteristics is her hiddenness. Maybe she is kind of shy; for she is the feeling interior of the field of the imaginal Sophia. This being, the black Madonna, serves as a mirror reflection for the human being to illumine our true likeness that is organized outside in the world, Sophia, and made visible and becoming vitalized in our bodies, Mary, and illumined from this interior, generative third. This is the soulÕs theophany.  The reason this heart thinking is so critical is that itÕs the very means that the Black Madonna enters the human consciousness just as it is human consciousness that attends to her coming in to existence.

Her blackness is not just her color but also the living blackening of divine mystery reflecting an enfolding sorrow tinged with love. Not the sorrow for what is missing but the sorrow for what only exists in the missing and is thereby nearly infinite, yet not even close at the same time. A luminous echo of our most precious, unloved wound, the near tear.

Thomas E. Bowman, son of Ruth and Richard, father of Jonah and Eliza, husband of Julie, practitioner of Classical 5 Element Acupuncture for 25 years and member of the first Sacred Service class. Attempting to build and live in an energy efficient home, in Freeport, Maine, all in preparation for the imaginal work of ushering Sophia to the forefront of the world.